<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Geography of UX: Why web user experience in Korea is not about the searchbox</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.strangesystems.com/blog/geography-of-ux.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.strangesystems.com/blog/geography-of-ux.html</link>
	<description>Architecture. User Experience. Exploring the overlap of physical and virtual.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2011 02:24:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.strangesystems.com/blog/geography-of-ux.html/comment-page-1#comment-1339</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2011 02:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.strangesystems.com/?p=732#comment-1339</guid>
		<description>Bryan - the difference in eye tracking behavior is very interesting! Thank you for your comments. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bryan &#8211; the difference in eye tracking behavior is very interesting! Thank you for your comments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bryan</title>
		<link>http://www.strangesystems.com/blog/geography-of-ux.html/comment-page-1#comment-1338</link>
		<dc:creator>Bryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2011 01:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.strangesystems.com/?p=732#comment-1338</guid>
		<description>I came across this while pondering the same question: why was Naver much more successful in Korea than Google? This is a bold and interesting interpretation of many of the factors, particularly the social historical interpretation.

The following resource seems highly relevant: Dong, Y., Lee, K. P. (2008). &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ijdesign.org/ojs/index.php/IJDesign/article/view/267/163&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;A cross-cultural comparative study of users&#039; perceptions of a webpage: With a focus on the cognitive styles of Chinese, Koreans and Americans&lt;/a&gt;.

Thanks for the post!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I came across this while pondering the same question: why was Naver much more successful in Korea than Google? This is a bold and interesting interpretation of many of the factors, particularly the social historical interpretation.</p>
<p>The following resource seems highly relevant: Dong, Y., Lee, K. P. (2008). <a href="http://www.ijdesign.org/ojs/index.php/IJDesign/article/view/267/163" rel="nofollow">A cross-cultural comparative study of users&#8217; perceptions of a webpage: With a focus on the cognitive styles of Chinese, Koreans and Americans</a>.</p>
<p>Thanks for the post!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

